The Narrator in Memoir

By Brendan O’Meara

After reading “The Body” by Stephen King, a fictional memoir of four pre-teens tromping off into the woods to find the dead body of a boy their age hit by a train, I was struck by how the narrator comes into the picture.

Gordie Lachance is grown up, professional writer looking back at this experience. On the one hand, he stays in the moment of his childhood, but then, at times, he swoops in and offers introspection, rumination, meaning from maturity and the distance between the current day and what he’s reflecting on.

It’s much like Ralphie in A Christmas Story or Nick Caraway in Gatsby. 

The story element is very tight, very focused: Labor Day weekend for The Body, the Christmas season for Ralphie, and one summer for Caraway, and so when the narrator from the future pops in, he pops in to reflect on a very tight window.

I think of this a lot. How much should we stay in the moment and how much should we offer the reflection of the guy who made it out alive to tell the story. It’s a fine balance, but all three have this in common: the narrator from the future has a very light hand. He and it is a he in these three cases, largely stays in the timeline of the story, probably 75% of the time.

That’s a good number to aim for.

Brendan’s Monthly Newsletter: First of the month! No spam! Can’t beat it!

* indicates required

An Editing Hack

By Brendan O’Meara

With a hat tip to the writer and editor Glenn Stout, a great editing trick is this:

Change the font and the change the size of the font.

I typically compose in Times New Roman, but to change the “eye level,” to borrow a baseball term, I then edit in Comic Sans size 14. 

I know, there’s all kinds of hate for Comic Sans, but let me tell you, I almost never miss a mistake.

Convert it back and ship your clean draft. Easy peasy. 

Brendan’s Monthly Newsletter: First of the month! No spam! Can’t beat it!

* indicates required

Episode 245: Phil Hoad and his Atavist Story ‘Cat and Mouse’

Phil Hoad
Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

Phil Hoad (@phload) is a journalist based in the south of France and his latest piece is featured in The Atavist. It’s titled “Cat and Mouse.”

It tells the story of two animal rights activists and their drive to find who they think is a serial killer of cats, rabbits, and foxes, but mainly cats.

In this bonus episode, I speak with lead editor Jonah Ogles (@jonahogles) about Phil’s pitch, what makes certain pitches have legs while others don’t, and the importance of figuring out how to end things. It’s much like when I spoke with Atavist editor-in-chief Seyward Darby.

Then Phil unpacks the story from there.

Continue reading “Episode 245: Phil Hoad and his Atavist Story ‘Cat and Mouse’”

Subverting Social Media

Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

This isn’t a tip on writing, but then again maybe it is.

I won’t bore you with what you likely know, but social media as we know it: Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and others are doing way more harm than good. The details of which I can’t and won’t get into here.

My real quandary is how do we get notices and broadcast our work if we’re in the digital sphere. After all, I make podcasts and blog, so how can I get the word out if I’m not findable in the context of social media?

Continue reading “Subverting Social Media”

Episode 244: Jackie MacMullan on the Fear of Failure, Writing that Teaches You, and the Final Chapter of ‘Best American Sports Writing’

View on Zencastr

Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

Jackie MacMullan, the legendary basketball writer, is on the podcast to talk about judging what we know to be the final installment of The Best American Sports Writing.

She’s chronicled the NBA (big ups to Louisa Thomas) since the early 1980s for The Boston Globe, Sports Illustrated and now ESPN.

Her five-part series on mental health in the NBA was widely lauded and a must-read.

Continue reading “Episode 244: Jackie MacMullan on the Fear of Failure, Writing that Teaches You, and the Final Chapter of ‘Best American Sports Writing’”

Chopping Onions

By Brendan O’Meara

Become a Patron!

Watching “Chopped” several years ago, I remember one young chef talk about his time coming up in the kitchen. He obviously had skill. He was on Chopped. 

But I suspect like most prestigious schools and the entitlement that comes with having graduated with what amounts to a worthless piece of paper, there’s a tendency even in the chef ranks to think you’re above a certain task.

Not this guy. I wish I knew his name.

In one of his testimonials, and I’m paraphrasing, he said, “If there was a pile of onions I had to chop, I was going to be the best damn chopper of onions.”

Man, I loved that sentiment. He wasn’t “above” cutting onions. How many thousands of onions had he chopped to that point? This was a job the dishwasher could do in a pinch. Here’s a trained chef being put on onion duty and he embraced it. The mundanity of chopping hundreds of onions in a shift, hunched over a pile, trying to make them as uniform slices and dices as possible, no doubt eyes burning the entire time. 

In our work, no matter our experience, our privilege, our education, how can we embrace chopping onions? How can we get lost in the most banal of tasks that have overreaching implications? 

He wasn’t really chopping onions. He was become more skilled with his knife. In the meditative trance of cutting onions, he was writing recipes. He was dreaming. He was developing rigor. 

Again, he wasn’t really chopping onions. Not the winners, not the people seeking to make change, anyway. 

Brendan’s Monthly Newsletter: First of the month! No spam! Can’t beat it!

* indicates required

Killing Yourself (Artistically) in Order to Live

By Brendan O’Meara

There’s a certain artistic suicide and artistic murder that takes place when you reach a certain level. 

My case study is Metallica, my favorite band, my home team, as I like to say. 

Their first four records were very heavy, thrash, genre-defining. They could have ridden that wave for their entire careers and done OK for themselves.

Instead, for their fifth album, they pivot by writing shorter songs, cleaner-sounding songs, still heavy, but you wouldn’t necessarily call them heavy metal anymore. 

They committed a kind of artistic suicide in order to live. It was more of a murder suicide, because they knew they’d be killing off much of the audience it took them ten years to build, too. 

On Rob Harvilla’s podcast about the songs of the 90s that define us, he had a conversation with the chef David Chang about The Black Album. Here’s a long quote from Chang:

I love growth in artistry. I love the fact that they were able to kill themselves in order to reach a new audience. They knew if they wanted to reach a different level, to push themselves out of their comfort zone. The hardest thing for them to do wasn’t to be more hard core and play it faster. It was how do I make someone that hates heavy metal, love heavy metal. That to me was a wildly difficult challenge and I admire that tremendously. I love when anybody tries to shoot for the moon and it could have really been just terrible. It wasn’t. I love that when you can grow and do something different and I don’t know if they get enough credit for doing that. The Black Album to me is what I always explain to someone who’s becoming a chef for the first time and they’re like getting out of the just trying to be cool phase. 

The hard thing isn’t to make five people happy. The hard thing is how do you make as many people as possible simultaneously. 

60 Songs That Explain the 90s

And that’s the balance. How much to you scratch your own itch vs. creating art with the empathy of an end user, a listener, a reader in mind?

Again, David Chang says:

The hardest thing is to kill yourself, metaphorically speaking as an artist and you don’t have to, but that’s part of the word I resonate with, how do you tell new stories, when you don’t it hurts like hell. I think we should celebrate more things like the Black Album. I hope we have more of them. 

Ibid

What Metallica did was they played to edges at first, way out on the fringe. They went super narrow, and it was only then that they could reel in a bit and become more generalists. It can never be the other way around where you try to appease the masses then get granular. The key to growing any audience is by going way out there, building trust, building true fans because you see them out on the edge, too. 

Then you can backpedal into broader reach.

Brendan’s Monthly Newsletter: First of the month! No spam! Can’t beat it!

* indicates required

Episode 242: ‘How Are You Going to Change the World?’ asks Damon Brown

View on Zencastr
Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

Damon Brown returns!

Had a great time talking about his new book Build from Now: Know Your Power, See Your Abundance and Change the World.

Damon’s all over the place. He’s talkin’ TED, he’s coaching, he’s almost written thirty books, he’s the primary caretaker of his two young boys, all of that and he’s one of the most generous people I’ve ever met. I think you’ll agree.

Continue reading “Episode 242: ‘How Are You Going to Change the World?’ asks Damon Brown”

Episode 241: Carolyn Holbrook and the Indispensable Nature of Writing and Teaching

Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

“I do a lot of encouraging people to journal and to just write it out, sing it out, dance it out, whatever you need to do,” says Carolyn Holbrook, author of Tell Me Your Names and I Will Testify: Essays (University of Minnesota Press).

Continue reading “Episode 241: Carolyn Holbrook and the Indispensable Nature of Writing and Teaching”

Productivity Hangovers

Become a Patron!

By Brendan O’Meara

I don’t know about you, but I tend to have really productive Mondays.

I don’t check social media. I’m clearing tasks. From dawn to dusk I’m feeling good. I get my lifts in. I get my 15,000 steps. Check check check.

But then Tuesdays and Wednesdays tend to be a drag and I never feel good. In fact, I feel sluggish and don’t get much of anything done compared to Monday. Then the shame cycle kicks in  and I can’t believe how little I’ve gotten done.

What’s the answer? 

My guess is two things.

One, social media isn’t much worth the time. When I abstain, I feel better emotionally and I’m more productive and more energized.

Two, doing too much on one day leaves you “sore” for the next day or two. Probably better to spread the tasks over a few days and get more “workouts” in. 

Similar to my riff on load management, maybe spreading the workload over more days instead going so hard on one will lead to greater gains over the course of a year.

Something to chew on. What do YOU think?